But Its Effects On Our Nation’s Elections And How We’re Governed Are Becoming Increasingly Visible.
According to a 2016 report from the brennan center for justice, dark money spending exploded in the state in the prior decade, from a total of $35,000 in the 2006 election cycle to $600,000 in the 2010 cycle, to a whopping $10.3 million in the 2014 cycle. The list of past and current arizona legislators who have benefited from “dark money” is long and the amount of money received by supported candidates is in the tens of millions. By 2014, that figure rose to more than $10 million.
Stop Voter Suppression Laws And Put An End To Dark Money In Politics.
May 8, 2018 1 comment. Arizona deserves better and stop dark money partner to defend democracy. According to a report by the brennan center, in 2012, there was $67,000 in dark money spending on commission races;
Today, Terry Is Fighting To Get The Stop Dark Money Initiative On The Ballot And Approved By Arizona Voters.
About arizona deserves better arizonans are opinionated, passionate, and politically diverse. By the goldwater institute the proponents of mandatory reporting of private civic activities have won a major marketing victory by the widespread use of the phrase, “dark money.” as one commentator put it, “dark money. Another dark money group, western tradition partnership, was forced to disclose its donors by a court in montana.
By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services.
Group seeking ‘dark money’ ban tries to ride wave of momentum. April 6, 2018 3 comments. House passes measure to keep cities from banning ‘dark money’ february 13, 2018 0.
Arizona Deserves Better Needs Over 150,000 Signatures In 90 Days!
Grassroots school group to tackle ‘dark money’ measure. It is widely believed that much of this money was spent by political groups funded by the arizona public service company (aps), arizona’s largest electric company. Phoenix — senate republicans on tuesday approved a series of changes in state campaign finance laws that foes say eases the flow of “dark money” and makes it harder for voters to know who is trying to affect the outcome of elections.